Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2560 14
Original file (NR2560 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
701 S. COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1004
ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490

 

BAN
Docket No.NRO2560-14

Reape ANA
5 AuGuUaL suis

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval
record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552. ,

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 August
2014. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in
accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable
to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by
the Board consisted of your application, together with all material
submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable
statutes, regulations and policies. tn addition, the Board considered
the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps (HOMC)
memo 1910 MMSR-2 of 1: duly 2014, @ COPY of which was provided to you
on 14 July 2014, and is being provided to you now. Additionally, the
Board alse considered your response to the A/O on 18 July 2014.

However, after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient
to establish the existence of probabie material error or injustice.

In this connection, the Board concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied.
The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken, You are entitled to have the Board
reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence
or other matter not previously considered by the Board.. In this
regard, it is also important to keep in mind that a presumption of
regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when
applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is
on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material

error ox injustice.
Gincerely,

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Acting Executive Director

Enclosure

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2685 14

    Original file (NR2685 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 July 2014. Therefore, your case was provided to the Board as is for final determination. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0851 14

    Original file (NR0851 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 July 2014. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Therefore, after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0879 14

    Original file (NR0879 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490 BAN Docket No.NROO879-14 21 July 2614 A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 July 2014. Documentary material considered by *he Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1323 14

    Original file (NR1323 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 July 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the.applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1036 14

    Original file (NR1036 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, his naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. ~ Therefore, your case was provided to the Board as is for final determination. Consequently, when applying for @ correction of an official naval record, the purden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error of injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1643 14

    Original file (NR1643 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    BR three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 July 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with ali material submitted in support thereof and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0080 14

    Original file (NR0080 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490 BAN Docket No.NROOO8O-14 7 July 2014 in reference to your recent Application for Correction A three-member panel of the Board for correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 June 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0894 14

    Original file (NR0894 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 July 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with Adil material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Therefore, your case was provided to the Board as is for final determination.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7250 14

    Original file (NR7250 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered’ your application on 20 January 2015. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. NR7250-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of 7 probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1747 14

    Original file (NR1747 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to. The Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps (HOMC) memo 1400/3 MMPR-2 of 16 May 2014, a copy of which was previously provided to you and which is now enclosed. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable...